The Chemical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz by anonymous (attributed to Johann Valentin Andreae), translated by Joscelyn Godwin, commentary by Adam McLean.
The blade of the sword:
"Solve et Coagula."
Though mostly, solve.
I think the thing that draws me to alchemy is that it is an attempt to build a morality on the back of science. Now, I admire ethics & condemn morality as a rule, so I've chosen my words carefully. Alchemy contains in it the proto-science of chemistry, joined together with the the more esoteric arts of philosophy & sorcery. It is an attempt to see the revealed knowledge of the world, combined with the occult knowledge of the adept, & to try to reconcile the two into a spiritual path toward correct behavior. I'm not sure it succeeds, but I don't think that makes it worthless, but rather makes it a worthy object of study. Especially for those of us who spend our time on such things; heck, what is my Prisoner's Dilemma musing
& the talk of a moral calculus but alchemy in the modern day?
This is an excellent introduction to alchemy-- not in that it is meant for beginners or that it contains explication of the subtle arts-- but rather because it is short, illustrative of alchemical symbolism, & has a strong & compelling narrative. That latter fact being a pleasant surprise! This is the third & most esoteric manifesto of The Rosicrucian Order, Christian Rosenkreutz being their eponymous & legendary founder. Like an alchemist's Pilgrim's Progress
, it is rich with symbolism-- which Adam McLean is happy to dissect in the appendix. I can only urge everyone with a shred of interest to pick this up & read it-- we can have ourselves a lively discussion. We do know we are being guided through an alchemical riddle-- when Christian asks his guide the Virgin for her name, she replies with a riddle, whose answer is "ALCHIMIA," an answer first teased out by Leibniz (56, 125). I will say-- I was surprised not to find a rebis at the end of this book!
If I have one complaint with McLean, it is that he focuses only on the esoteric, & does not mention that physical procedures are part & parcel. While the physical transmutations rule the pop culture's understanding of alchemy, we shouldn't let that occlude the fact that it was not an entirely personal & spiritual affair by way of over compensation. Thus, while McLean wisely discusses the altar & the items upon it, he leaves out any more physical interpretations-- when in fact, many an alchemical treatise has its formulas hidden in allegory & metaphor (62, 130). He makes up for it with a good skill for summary & explication, bringing together disparate elements into a whole. The seven gifts given to Christian are a good example-- though again, the literal implications aren't gone into over much (21, 26-28, 132-133). He has wise things to say about the play within the play as an answer key, as it were, but sadly overlooks the best part-- that in between acts they bring on the Four Beasts of Daniel are a sideshow (68-71, 66, 138-139).
The Tower & processes wherein & by which the resurrection takes place reminds me of nothing so much as the images in the Voynich Manuscript
(85). Here at last McLean mentions in passing albedo, nigredo, citrinitas & rubedo, the core stages of alchemy, in relation to a bird's transformations (87, 143). He's passed by the colours in the work at hand, as well as the changes in garments that the author brings attention to, which I think is a missed opportunity (65, 69-70, to note just a couple I found flipping quickly through). Still-- no appendix can be thorough in totality, & McLean's is very adroit. In particular he noted the stages of the knighthood, the books signed, the symbols taken-- the rose cross, the golden fleece, the golden stone. I'm particularly fond of that, since it played heavily in an earlier Oubliette campaign
. I was also impressed by, & must agree with, McLean's opinions on the wings, ladders, & ropes of the guests at the tower (83, 141). Toward the end, McLean mentions a few works influenced by the Chemical Wedding
, including Goethe's "Fairy Tale of the Green Snake & the Beautiful Lily" (150). Oh, how I hate Goethe. I hate him for ruining Faust
with his moralizing, & when McLean notes that Goethe alters the themes & symbols of the Chemical Wedding
to suit his ideology & politics, it just made me hate him all the more.