mordicai caeli (mordicai) wrote,
mordicai caeli

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Character Traits & Exceptional Mechanics.

(From Ask Chris #49: D&D with Super-Heroes, by Chris Sims.

I have been continuing to think about roleplaying stuff, so I figured I'd spool out my train of thought to keep up with what I've been mulling over. I continue to really like the idea of Character Traits, & they will definitely be appearing in some form or another in the next campaign I run. That being said, the major problem I've identified is that you lose a degree of the "neat rule hacks," which is a shame. I am a big proponent of the idea that the rules can help you tell the story; at the very most basic level there is the fact that attributes & skills help describe a character's strengths & weaknesses, right? & different mechanics twists can help distinguish races or classes from one another. A game with lots of hit points tells a more swashbuckling story than a game with more limited health options, which tends to be more "gritty." It is a language of subtext, & that can be exploited by the system & the Narrator to good effect. Conversely, relatively minor tweaks, especially conditional ones, really bug me. Give me minor constant hacks or major conditional ones.

I still don't have an easy answer for what to do, here. I really do think it is important. By way of example-- making antagonists in Oubliette is easy. All I have to come up with is an "Attack" value, a "Defense" value, & a "Health" value. Theoretically these should be derived from the creature's statitics, but why bother? Just eyeball it, since only the output matters. This template has one problem-- it is boring. So I spice it up a little. The Sugarcane Slasher was able to pull the PCs a number of squares equal to the number of successes it rolled on attack, trading damage for distance one to one. The Demi of the Terror Wolf Mob gave their targets a minus one penalty every time they hit them with their "neural whips." When the Players fought the mime-assassins of the Vanitas Vichey, those guys rolled a d10 every hit & dealt a random point of Attribute damage-- 0 being Narrator's choice. So on & so forth. Those little pinpricks, those dashes of colour, help make things interesting, & I'd hate to remove them from the table, as far as Characters go. In fact, the strength of the current Merit system is the use of ad hoc rules-- if there is a Player who wants to disarm people, the onus should be on him. It is an elegant dodge of the horrors of, for instance, Dungeons & Dragons' grapple mechanics.

So what are the important rules? Well, there are the very broad ones. 9-again rolls & 8-again rolls, those are both vivid, flavorful, & Players remember them. Auto-successes are also good-- I've used 9-again & auto-successes with items & I have had very positive results. Rote actions & advanced actions both give you re-rolls, & thus are much heftier, right? So I'm not sure where they fit in. I can even come up with some other neat fundamental mechanics-- 7-success, where rolls of a seven or better are successes, rather than the typical eight or better? Boom, there you go. I've had a few ideas-- maybe items shouldn't grant extra dice, maybe they should all be 9- or 8-again? Nah, if I'm going to do that I should just have variable difficulties, which isn't the worst idea, but a different discussion entirely. I could just have a "Hacks" section of the character sheet, or little boxes next to each skill, but then how much XP does a 9-again cost? & those are just baseline mechanics fiddling-- as I described above with the various monsters & villains, more specific rules mini-games are also a lot of fun. At some point this over-laps with Powers-- things like Disciplines & Gifts-- which is something else to keep in mind. Hrmph.

On the subject of the fact that there aren't any Traits derived from Presence, Manipulation & Intelligence, I have had a few ideas. First-- what if Willpower was derived from either Resolve plus Composure or Presence plus Intelligence? Or, well-- I understand the logic behind Resolve plus Composure, but I think Presence is a potential source as well, right? Self-confidence lending itself to Willpower. Anyhow, I like Willpower, & I might be alright with giving characters a higher over-all Willpower, right? Something to think about, anyway. I really like Defense, which is calculated by the lower of your Dexterity or your Wits. It makes players make hard choices, which I find to be the sign of a rewarding mechanic. Plus-- & this goes to the ability of rules to tell stories & to the idea of special rules hacks as Powers-- you can flip it so that a character or race or whatever has the higher of Wits or Dexterity, & boom. Isn't that interesting? I think so, anyhow. I've discounted the idea of a "Wyrd" or "Glamour" pool-- too much complexity for too little gain, especially since Willpower already exists & can be co-opted for the same thing. I still occasionally think of a "Resistance" Trait, like Defense for Social & Supernatural attacks-- an idea, right? Or "Aura," as a sort of default area of effect? Nah, that is too abstract. Anyhow, this is the kind of direction I'm thinking of taking it.
Tags: attributes, house rules, oubliette, rpgs, traits, wod

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.