mordicai caeli (mordicai) wrote,
mordicai caeli

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Thinking about it.

I wonder about the phrase "fiscal conservative," since I hear it fairly often. I've gone on the record before saying that I'll take a "social liberal, fiscal conservative" over the reverse any day of the week but...well, the term sticks in my craw. "Fiscal conservative." I wonder about it, who is being taken in by it. I mean-- federal tax dollars are spent on the military, on Social Security, & on Medicare/Aid. That is what money is spent on, but I don't hear "fiscal conservatives" ever bring that stuff up, really. Old people vote, & that keeps them away from Social Security & Medicare. I suppose you do hear the occasional murmurs about it from the fringe, but you don't really hear people going gonzo, do you? Maybe you do. & the military, heaven forbid you talk about the military spending, despite the fact that it is supporting a silly industrial complex. Seriously, air superiority fighters from the 70s? Ugh. I actually am for new innovation in spending; lets get some R&D going! If the F-22 hadn't been an air superiority fighter, I would have been all for it. I guess there are robots, at least. The military is on the cutting edge there, that is something. Still, I'm not a "fiscal conservative," but rather the vilified "tax & spend." It just seems odd that "tax & spend" is supposed to be the bad thing, when "fiscal conservative," as far as I can figure out, just means "spend without taxing." People talk about Reagen-- hey, he grew the economy, true enough. Except, well-- he grew it for rich people, & made more poor people, & the trick to growing the economy was...taking on a huge national debt. Somehow that is "fiscal conservatism?" Edit: Oh my gosh, eff you, "fiscal conservatives." Here is the Deficit & Surplus breakdown of the last fifty years.

I don't know, I was just thinking about it on account of thinking about prisons. Or well, I was thinking about the application of Game Theory to ethics. I think the Iterative Prisoner's Dilemma actually has critical & fundamental lessons. They are simple, but that is because they are building blocks-- & complexity evolves out of them. The strategy for a high scoring player, according to Robert Axelrod's research, is compelling. To be Nice, which is to say-- to presume innocence, to begin by cooperating. Not mindlessly-- a good strategy Retaliates, & punishes cheaters who don't cooperate. They don't do so relentlessly, which is to say, they are Forgiving-- once the other player begins cooperating, you stop retaliating. Tit for tat is the name of the game. The most difficult part is to be Non-envious, to not worry about the other player's scores. The goal is for you to score as high as possible; forget what the others are up to. I think this speaks to a lot of valid options on the political spectrum, but because it is called "the Prisoner's Dilemma," it got me thinking about actual prisons. Prisons are dumb-- I mean, I'm not a bleeding heart here, but what a mess. I think it doesn't need to be argued that the "justice" system in general, & prisons in particular, are profoundly racist. & that the upswing in drug incarceration is frankly stupid. What is worse, though, to me, is that prison's don't serve a real purpose. Are they just meant to keep people "off the street?" That seems counter productive-- but they certainly aren't trying to re-educate anyone (as dystopian as that sounds). Really though, prisons are creating criminals. They fail in Game Theory strategies. They aren't forgiving. I am all for retaliation, but not blindly. & really, prisons aren't about any of these things. They are about money. Money for corporations. Which is how it always ends up these days, isn't it?
Tags: gifs, ideology, politics

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.