mordicai caeli (mordicai) wrote,
mordicai caeli

  • Mood:
  • Music:

double post!

(in response to this post from geekdad_rss)

Okay, a few points. Claiming Paizo's release of the rules as a pdf brings the "open source sensibility" is a little bit of a snub on Wizards...who released the Open Gaming License originally. I like Paizo a great deal, but they are releasing free information for free. Not that big a deal. Anyhow, Paizo (& all the slew of other OGL & d20 publishers) will keep up with 3e(ish) stuff as long as it it profitable-- heck, there are companies today publishing 1st edition material.

There are a lot of detractors of the 4e, sure-- I think they are being silly but that is neither here nor there-- & they will keep buying books. For a little while, at least. & Paizo will keep selling it to them...especially because to do otherwise would be to lay fallow for a year or so. I think looking at it as a blow to the OGL is a wrong-headed way of looking at things. Heck, increasing interest in DnD sales can only inevitably help Wizards of the Coast. That is part of why the SRD/OGL model is so interesting & successful. Buy all the Green Ronin you want! All the Mongoose books you can carry! You might want to also pick up the PHB while you are at it. CHA-CHING!!!

I think Wizards has handled DnD much better than TSR ever did. If you REALLY want to talk about Wizard's screwing Paizo, about refusing the Dragon/Dungeon magazine license (almost certainly complete with a Do Not Compete clause of some kind, right?) to....publish the content online FOR PAY. What is this, 1991? Didn't this concept die out with the other dotcom dinosaurs? Pay-for-access websites? What a joke.
Tags: dnd

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.